搜搜做题作业网新概念四有这么一句话Such inns as there were were generally dirty and f
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：搜搜做题作业网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/07/01 05:29:05
新概念四有这么一句话
Such inns as there were were generally dirty and flea-ridden;the food simply local cheese accompanied by bread often twelve months old,all washed down with coarse wine.
说是由于上下文语义明确并且为使句子简练,在该并列句food后省略了谓语动词was
我想请问一下 什么情况下谓语动词可以省略 有没有具体的语法?
那样省略的话 句子成分不就不完整了么?
Such inns as there were were generally dirty and flea-ridden;the food simply local cheese accompanied by bread often twelve months old,all washed down with coarse wine.
说是由于上下文语义明确并且为使句子简练,在该并列句food后省略了谓语动词was
我想请问一下 什么情况下谓语动词可以省略 有没有具体的语法?
那样省略的话 句子成分不就不完整了么?
一般谓语动词是不能省略的,因为句子成分不完整,但是如果一个句子中前后是并列的,就可以,或者再加上有and,but等词
再问： 上一句话 两个分句的主语不一样 那第二句不是就缺主语了么？
再答： 我个人认为，这个simply local cheese是来修饰food的，是food的更进一步表达，真正的谓语动词是后面的accompanied，不知道我这个理解是否给你带来帮助了
再问： 新概念四的导学上写的 该并列句food后省略了谓语动词was 我觉得谓语动词不是后面的accompanied 因为后面还有个by 所以 accompanied by bread 是cheese的后置定语吧 唉 好纠结
再答： 额，是哦，那应该就是导学上讲的，这个具体是要看语境的，英语就是这样，有时候一般规律在一定情况下是不适用的，不过你还是记住谓语动词不要省略就对了，因为这是肯定的，也是不会出错的
再问： 上一句话 两个分句的主语不一样 那第二句不是就缺主语了么？
再答： 我个人认为，这个simply local cheese是来修饰food的，是food的更进一步表达，真正的谓语动词是后面的accompanied，不知道我这个理解是否给你带来帮助了
再问： 新概念四的导学上写的 该并列句food后省略了谓语动词was 我觉得谓语动词不是后面的accompanied 因为后面还有个by 所以 accompanied by bread 是cheese的后置定语吧 唉 好纠结
再答： 额，是哦，那应该就是导学上讲的，这个具体是要看语境的，英语就是这样，有时候一般规律在一定情况下是不适用的，不过你还是记住谓语动词不要省略就对了，因为这是肯定的，也是不会出错的
在新概念英语第四册中Such Inns as there were were generally dirty and f
Such inns as there were were generally dirty and flea-ridden
In the 20th century,there were many i_____ such as CDs and v
thc,thc,dirty,were,fridge,cupboards,and(.)
Such people as were mentioned by him were honest.
as such------the case,there were no grounds to be angry with
这个句子哪里错了.There were many kinds of animals in the zoo,such as
There were dirty marks on her trousers_______she had wiped h
were there.there were
there were [ ] people and factories
一个单词row用法查一本字典有说row是vt.,那新概念里有一句话there were some people rowi
英语翻译正老师,在人教版新版八年级下的一篇文章中有这么一句话,There were many times when Ar