请用中文翻译下面英文Money made from this cannot be regarded as green G

请用中文翻译下面英文
Money made from this cannot be regarded as green GDP, for it involves pollution of the minds. The departments run the risk of becoming accomplices to porn websites if they do not bear the social effects and healthy growth of young people in mind.
Some say it is a formidable task to control lewd content because of the huge amount of information online. However, if we truly realize the harm this is causing to our society and if we sincerely care for the future generations, we can find ways to combat it. What is needed is a holistic approach that includes technology, legislation and political will.
Viruses, phishing, spyware, spam, denial-of-service attacks, botnets you have probably heard these words, and perhaps even suffered from what they signify, with or without knowing it.
I'd like to lay out a simple path to addressing (not resolving) these security problems, one that does not require agreement among all governments (or people) on what really constitutes a crime, much less a global police force or unenforceable global treaties. If we can increase security in general, then governments can focus on the real criminals.
A better approach is to view computer security as an issue of public health and economics, in which people can protect themselves but must pay for the costs they impose on others. We need to enable people to defend themselves against others; prevent innocent, well-meaning people from becoming infected and harming others; and reduce the incentives and ability of the ill-intentioned to do harm.
That sounds like a lot of different challenges. But there are effective approaches to each of them that do not require tracking everyone online, or requiring IDs for every interaction. Tracking user IDs will not enable us to catch or stop bad guys, and it will render the Internet impossible to use. We can't save cyberspace by destroying its openness.
To implement effective security, the entities best equipped to do so, the Internet service providers, must take the lead. They are technically savvy organizations with the ability (more or less) to protect users and detect abusers; they have a direct (though impersonal) relationship with their users; and they compete for users' business, so that, unlike governments, they will suffer if they perform badly.
The ISPs (rather than governments) should provide basic security - anti-virus, anti-phishing, anti-spam, and the like - as a regular feature of consumer Internet services. This is not hard to do. A number of anti-virus companies compete to offer consumer security services; each ISP could select one, or offer its customers a choice of three, for example. The trick is to get consumers to use these tools - which will require an awareness campaign along the lines of public health messages. The result should be something closer to widespread hand washing than to a system of acute-care hospitals.

由于思想污染,从这方面赚的钱不能作为GDP.要是他们不能承担对社会的影响和青少年健康成长的责任.部门就会有成为“不良网站帮凶”的风险,
有人说要控制大量淫秽内容的网上信息是一项艰巨的任务,但是,如果我们真正认识到了对我们社会造成的危害,如果我们真心为子孙后代着想,我们可以想到办法应对.现需要的是一个全面可行的方案,包括技术,司法和政治意愿.
你可能听说过这些词甚至受过其害,病毒,网络欺诈,间谍软件,垃圾邮件,攻击,僵尸网络,有些是知道的有些是不知道的.
我想用一个简单的方式来展现（不是解决）这些安全问题,不能求所有政府（或个人）同意那是犯罪,更别说一个全球性的警察力量或无法执行全球性条约.如果我们全面加强,那么政府就能专注于真正的罪犯.
一个更好的办法是将电脑犯罪视为一个公共健康和经济问题,人们可以保护自己,但必须支付相关的费用,让他们加强计算机安全.我们必须使人们能依靠别人保护自己,防止无辜的,善意的人受害和危害他人,以及降低恶意伤害的能力.
这听起来像是一个很大的不同的挑战.有效的办法不是要追查每个人上网和控制上网的ID.那样不会让我们抓住坏人和阻止犯罪,这样可能会使互联网无法使用,我们不能用破坏网络开放来节省网络空间.
为了实施有效的安全,最好这样做,互联网服务供应商必须主导.它们在技术上有能力（或多或少）,保护用户监管网络犯罪,他们与用户有一个直接的（虽然客观）关系,他们为用户的业务相互竟争,这与政府不同,如果他们做得不好,将承担后果.
互联网服务供应商（而不是政府）应提供基本的防病毒,防网络欺炸,反垃圾邮件等服务作为一个对消费者普通的互联网服务,这很易做到.几家反病毒公司通过竞争提供消费者安全服务;每个网络服务提供者可以选择一项,或为客户提供三个选择.比如让消费者使用这些工具的窍门- 需要一个以公众健康资讯为主的的宣传活动.其效果相当于多洗手与医院紧急救治体系的区别.